Tag Archives: Greening homes

Cooking on the Esse Ironheart woodstove

Fire burning in the Esse Ironheart woodstove

In late 2010 we moved into our new ICF (insulated concrete form) home: it’s a bungalow with a walk-out basement that was built into the side of a hill and to maximize southern exposure. Although we installed a natural gas furnace, we’re realizing that with the Esse Ironheart woodstove that we purchased and situated in the centre of our main floor, we probably didn’t need to do this. This year we’re setting ourselves the challenge of heating the house 100% with the Esse Ironheart’s clean woodburning heat. In this series I will document our progress with this target, our observations and tips, and also our efforts to cook and bake as much as possible on the Ironheart instead of using our conventional electric stove.

Cooking update

November has been a month with wide temperature swings; we’ve had quite a few days this month with no need to heat our home, and other days where warming the house with the woodstove was very welcome. That has made it tricky to get into good routines with the Ironheart, but we’re getting there.

My own personal weakness in this area is that when I’m preparing to cook a meal I may often be setting a pot of water to boil, and it’s deeply ingrained in me to do this on the top of our conventional stove. I’m having to work to train myself to take this activity to the Ironheart. Baking or heating a casserole-type dish is the area where I find it easiest to remember the woodstove, and I find that I’ll naturally follow the woodstove’s temperature reading to see when it will be ready to heat something in the oven. Part of that is also naturally to do with the fact that baking or making a casserole or lasagna generally involves a little bit more forethought or planning, unlike walking into the kitchen to boil water for pasta for a quick lunch.

Now, this is where I need to add that regulating the heat in the Ironheart is not something that we’ve finetuned yet. The Ironheart comes equipped with a temperature gauge with a needle that tracks across a dial that reads ‘Cool, ‘Warm’, ‘Hot’ and ‘Very Hot’. To date, we’ve managed to successfully make bread, pizzas, and a pumpkin pie all without the aid of an internal stove thermometer, but it’s time that we bit that bullet. Today I burned a double batch of banana bread, which was really frustrating. The mistake was all mine: the trend we’ve noticed so far is that even when the dial reads ‘Very Hot’, it can take somewhat longer to bake an item than it would take to cook in our conventional electric oven. On this basis alone I set the timer for the amount of time that I would normally bake the loaves in the conventional oven and proceeded to forget all about them. When the time came to pull them out, disappointment was mine. There are two small shelves inside the oven, and it’s the loaf on the upper shelf that had a nearly charred top (inside it was still pretty nice; we just cut off the burnt shell!). The lower loaf was ‘overbrowned’ rather than burnt, and it’s the loaf that my husband and I will eat anyway. (When making banana bread, I typically double the batch and bake one loaf plain for my sons and bake the other with dates, nuts or other more textural additions).

Overall, we’ve cooked and baked a fair amount on the Ironheart this month, including breakfast fry-ups, sauteing various dishes, heating up casseroles, baking bread, pumpkin pie and banana bread. In general, the results have been good: the cooking surface on top of the stove heats up very quickly and it’s possible to start preparing a meal on top of the Ironheart within minutes of lighting the day’s fire in the firebox. I haven’t yet timed how long it typically takes to get to a good baking temperature inside the oven box, but it’s definitely within the hour as suggested by Esse in its documentation.

Regulating the temperature of a woodstove is a lost skill for many modern folk, ourselves included; we’re undergoing a real learning experience and fortunately enjoying it very much. There is something extremely simple and satisfying about starting the first fire of the day, getting the stove to cooking/baking strength and then managing the heat peaks and troughs throughout the day. The challenges that we’ve got include:

1. No hob lids; we’re still unclear from Esse whether our Ironheart should have come with lids as standard, but we’re in the process of ordering a pair (the question of the lids is a whole other saga which I plan to write about: the Ironheart is one of the best finds of our lives, but so far the North American support/sales arm has been disappointing). Hob lids are key to keeping the heat inside the stove and so, unless you are cooking on top, you would normally have the lids in the closed position unless you needed the extra heat that emanates out from the top of the stove. We most certainly do not need that extra heat usually because our home is so airtight and energy efficient.

2. Further to point 1 above, our house is made out of insulated concrete forms (ICF) and it retains heat incredibly well. Last winter when we were just getting acquainted with our Ironheart, we regularly experienced temperature spikes approaching 30 degrees celsius! It was summer clothes in January at our house until we learned how to make smaller, more controlled fires in the Ironheart (a topic I will cover in a future post), thereby keeping the heat production down. We’re definitely doing better with this overall this year, but getting our lids will be a welcome development. The wonderful upside to the fact that our house is concrete is the fact that it retains heat so well: as long as we regulate the temperature rise from the woodstove, we’re always toasty and on very, very little wood. Even in the coldest months, the house generally doesn’t fall below 18 degrees celsius overnight, and that’s with allowing the fire in the woodstove to die out early in the evening. The Ironheart is so safe and efficient that you could easily keep a fire burning in it overnight if you needed to, but we just don’t have the need. So, overall, the fact that our house is ICF is most definitely a huge advantage rather than a disadvantage, but it does present a challenge in terms of heat spikes.

3. I think our third challenge is just our need to completely adapt to living with a woodstove. We’re needing to put some time and energy into thinking about our meal plans and how we cook in the colder months so that we take full advantage of the cooking and baking options offered by the Ironheart. With some planning, we really shouldn’t need to be consuming much electricity to prepare our meals in the cold months, as the Ironheart can do it all for us. My current reading pile includes a couple of woodstove cookbooks and it’s helping me to think a bit differently about meal preparation. (I will be posting about our plans for cooking and baking in the hot months as part of this series, when using the Ironheart inside of our home would be madness!)

Because I’m composing this post at a truck stop (really!) tonight, I don’t have the photos to hand that I wanted to share with this post, but you can look forward to burnt banana bread some time soon.

12 Comments

Filed under Esse woodstove

Tips on heating a home with and cooking on an Esse Ironheart

Now that the warm weather is here and seems as though it may be getting set to stay, I figure that I won’t have much cause to write about the Esse Ironheart woodstove until the fall. I thought I’d log (no pun intended!) a few tips here while they are still fresh from our first winter and early spring heating our home with the Ironheart, as well as cooking on and in it.

The Ironheart is one heck of an efficient woodstove, but it takes some getting used to. When everything is working smoothly, you can look through the door and see the wood gas inside igniting, which is one of the reasons why this woodstove is so clean compared to many woodstoves.

The key things that we’ve learned about helping our Ironheart to work efficiently include building fires at the back of the box and cutting wood into smaller pieces (eg quarter cuts of logs already split for burning – full logs were just too intense). Both of these things have made it much easier to control the heat generated, which has been particularly important for us as we live in a concrete house (ICF) and it gets awfully warm in here awfully quick. You don’t want to have to strip down too much when guests come over!

Overall, the Ironheart just doesn’t need a lot of wood to create a good burn and retain heat, so less wood is needed compared to most traditional woodstoves. On a typical winter’s day (eg -10 degrees Celsius) we could keep our home warm and toasty on just four split logs a day. If I ever move, I want to bring my Ironheart with me.

1 Comment

Filed under Esse woodstove, Farm life, Greening homes

25 cent Friday

basket

I bought this basket for 25 cents at our local second hand/charity shop during the winter. It has since been pressed into use to organize kindling and paper for our woodstove. It has a dark grey stain that matches the cabinets in our kitchen, which is adjacent to the woodstove. Damn, it matches! I love buying old things and recycling - why can't spending a quarter always be this amazing?

3 Comments

Filed under Greening homes, The joy of recycling

Cooking on a woodstove

Okay, so the house is finished and we’re actually living here now and I haven’t even finished writing about it and how we went about building it. Think I started on that project back in the late spring…

Details. All in good time. You know.

What I really want to show you now is the essential that we splashed out on:

Esse Ironheart

This is the Esse Ironheart. A woodstove, a cookstove. This is my Little-House-on-the-Prairie cooker. Though this is not my house - this is a photo borrowed from the Esse website!

Our new house is a bungalow with one major central room that encompasses living, dining and kitchen areas into one; it has low ceilings and can be closed off from other parts of the house completely. The Ironheart sits in the middle of the room. It is our backup plan for when we lose power and it is also, thanks to its daily presence, our one indulgence. But it’s so much more than that.

This is one energy efficient cookstove. Three sticks of wood burned for hours the other afternoon and evening and kept the house toasty (yes, we lowered the furnace right down). Three skinny-ish logs; our old traditional fireplace in our last home would have wolfed that down in the first 45 minutes and any heat generated would have gone straight up the chimney. Bog standard woodstoves are similarly bad at actually heating the rooms they occupy. The Ironheart is also incredibly clean in how it burns, making it even greener.

What’s not to love?

We’ve had a couple of fires, just to test drive it, but now we’ve got to get to grips with cooking on and in it. My sweet husband has just pointed me to the Esse website for their suggested recipes. They all look good.

So, I need to ask you. What should we try first?

  • Baked fish with fennel and potatoes (mmmm…)
  • Pizza with roast beetroot, kale, anchovies, and thyme (kale!)
  • Lemon sponge puddings (something sweet?)
  • A plain old loaf of bread (they say you can’t beat a loaf of bread baked in the Ironheart)
  • Or, the 18-pound turkey that Dave from The Piggy Market is setting aside for me (that makes me nervous…I know you’re out there Dave – what would you do?)

I think this Christmas holiday will be all about the food at our house, in a new way. Between the cookstove and the new food processer that my two boys have claimed for their own (that’s a whole other post), and the fact that I’ve got Julia Child’s French Kitchen on DVD for our downtime, I think we’re done with Christmas planning before we even start.

Merry early Christmas.

7 Comments

Filed under Esse woodstove, Greening homes, Local food

Building a greener home – part 1

Back in 2008 both my husband and I came away from watching Garbage Warrior feeling excited, even somehow galvanized. We came away from it wondering if we could knock down our 70-year old home in a leafy west Ottawa neighbourhood and replace it with an earthship, a la Michael Reynolds. We knew that rammed tires wouldn’t go over well with the neighbours as an aesthetic (nor did we really want to knock down a perfectly good house that just needs to be made more energy efficient), and we watched with interest the emergence of more traditional house-forms that used earthship technologies. Over time, as we let things sink in, we came to realize what we really wanted to do.

Building a “green” house was definitely part of the picture (I say that parenthetically as there as so many ways to approach home building in a more environmentally friendly way), but more than that, we wanted to move out of an urban environment, find somewhere that we could live on a small scale and have access to locally grown food (including growing more of it ourselves) and amenities. We wanted a more rural setting, but not to place ourselves so far out of the fray that we would be compelled to drive everywhere. We wanted the opposite, in fact – to enjoy a more rural setting while still being able to walk and cycle most of the places that we would need and want to get to on a regular basis.

Mission impossible (we wondered)?

It took us another 18 months after first seeing that film about renegade architect Michael Reynolds to get serious about looking for our new home. We had a clear checklist in mind, and yet didn’t know if what we were looking for was entirely possible. We also assumed that we’d be buying a patch of land with an older home on it that we’d need to fix up/maintain for a period until we could manage to build our own “earthship” (parantheses this time as by now we knew that the rammed tire technology was not practical or desirable for where we live, in the frozen north).

As with much in our lives, we spent quite a long time mulling things over in a vague way before we actually got inspired to the point of really getting focused on the issue. (Our children were already talking regularly to other people in their lives about the fact that we were going to “move to the country” some day, but I think they had their doubts that it would ever happen.)  It was a chance conversation with a prospective client for our business who was building her own home that really lit a fire under us. This generous person shared the ups and downs of her own story (very different from ours, but still very instructive) with us, and gave us a very sage piece of advice about location. Make sure you are outside of the City of Ottawa, she intoned, or you will be bogged down with permits, bureaucracy and delays. (For any readers not familiar with Ottawa, the city covers a ridiculously large amount of geography for a citizenry of barely one million souls, and it is indeed possible to live “in the countryside” within city limits.)

Even though we had considered going as far as Peterborough, Ontario (three hours west of our current home in Ottawa), we really had no idea of where we were going to find our future community, and that warning really helped us to think clearly about the “where”. And within two weeks or so of that meeting, we had found the land that we wanted to buy. We were conducting regular searches online and chanced upon a listing for an acreage that looked from its Google Maps link as though it was at least 1.5 hours west of Ottawa, but whose description provided us with a hint that eventually led to the truth: it was located on the town boundary of a small town 45 minutes west of Ottawa. When we uncovered the truth of its position, we couldn’t quite believe our luck until we went to see it ourselves. It was indeed a large patch of land that had formerly been a berry farm and was within easy walking and cycling distance of the town centre.

Suffice it to say, after a brief period looking further into the land and our financing, we made the purchase. It was initially daunting to find ourselves owners of this parcel of now wild, formerly farmed land, particularly as it was the only parcel of land that we viewed in person before deciding to buy it. This is quite typical for us: we bought our very first home together having viewed only three  properties, and we purchased our current home having first seen only one other property. Our first rented flat in the UK was chosen by my husband without my seeing it (as I was in Canada at the time) and we decided to buy our current home without my husband ever stepping foot in it (he being back in the UK dealing with the sale of our first house). I know this type of behaviour can be shocking for folks who are used to conducting extensive research and making detailed comparisons before making such a big purchase. It has usually worked out for us…

The one thing missing from our new land was a house, or indeed any building of any kind, apart from a small shed-like hut that we call the berry shack. So, building a new home moved up the list quite urgently. Perhaps surprisingly for us, we interviewed two architects and one builder. We selected the builder and decided to forego an architect. The extra fees for an architect (10% of the entire cost of the build) and the process (which we felt would add too much time to the entire undertaking, as well as increase the likelihood that we would overengineer the homebuilding thing and tip over into “dream home” territory, which we did not want to do) were the main deterrents.

Our choice of builder, a local in our new community, turned out to be beyond brilliant. He answered all of our questions, helped us navigate the early stages of the whole design process and patiently sat by as we tinkered with our own plan for the house (based on plans that we found online and wished to modify). Several weeks into the process he showed up with some plans of his own for houses he had built, and ever so diplomatically suggested that they might offer a solution to the problems we had been encountering. Breathing a sigh of relief, we selected a plan and engaged in a process of modifying it to suit our needs with the help of our builder and an architectural technologist (basically someone with technical drawing skills who understands home building and codes). So for about $1,500 – instead of $40k plus – we had our plans.

Okay, but plans for what? Let me back up and say that while we had long since given up our idea of an earthship (be it fabricated of recycled tires or concrete), in the end, our own research and our conversations with our builder helped us to realize that we would be building something very like an earthship in its fundamentals. ICF (insulated concrete forms) homebuilding is all about building a house with a super energy efficient envelope out of concrete. ICF homes do very well on passive solar gain and are amazing at staying cool in the summer and warm in the winter, which is exactly what we need here in eastern Ontario.

Here is where I will end part one of this tale, but not without a parting shot. ICF is an amazing way to build a home, and yet homeowners don’t know what the hell it is and mainstream builders sure as heck aren’t using it. They wouldn’t, would they, if homeowners aren’t asking for it. So, without further ado, here’s a glimpse at ICF construction. In part two I’ll write more about other  green decisions and choices for our new home.

New ICF house taking shape in eastern Ontario

As I've stated in a previous post, building an ICF home is a lot like building with Lego. Green foam blocks held together by plastic forms that slot together (metal rebar and concrete come later). This is a shot of the lower level of our bungalow with a walkout basement.

Pouring concrete for a house made of insulated concrete forms

This picture was taken the day of the second pour of concrete for the upper or main level of our new bungalow. (This is a good day to choose to stay out of your builder's hair.)

Looking into the lower level of a new ICF house

Looking into the double doorway of the lower level of the house. The front of the house, which is north facing, looks like a typical bungalow. The rear, which is south facing, is two stories of large windows and doors.

Basement interior of a new ICF house

A view of the basement from the inside. The single door at the rear is for a cold storage room.

South facing view of new ICF house with screened in porch

A view of the south facing rear of the house, where its two stories become visible. The wooden structure is a screened in porch.

Front view of new ICF bungalow

And the view from the front...we couldn't afford to build a free standing barn, so we opted for a bungalow with an attached "two car" garage. Quite funny for a family that prefers to have no car. A long term plan is to find an old barn that we can dismantle and rebuild on our land.

1 Comment

Filed under Greening homes, Living locally, Local food

Building a new house and making green choices

I’ve been meaning to write here about our new house, which is steadily rising out of the ground. For now, here’s a picture.

Early steps in building a house out of insulated concrete forms

Our ICF house starts to take shape - it's a bit like building with Lego

There is an image here of a single ICF house left standing after Hurricane Katrina (the surrounding “stick build” houses are simply gone). This is what resonates with our boys. Super energy efficient? Hmm, okay. Able to withstand hurricane winds and nearby explosions (yes, that’s another link I must dig out and share)? Bring it on!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Greening homes